Purpose of the Questionnaire (Scale)

The purpose of the Constructive Thinking Questionnaire (CTQ) is to measure the thinking strategies that individuals use in their daily situations and to assess their ability to think in a way that promotes problem-solving and mental well-being. These strategies include recognizing the need for positive thinking, solving problems logically, and developing healthy thought patterns that help in coping with difficulties and emotional challenges.

Questionnaire Analysis (Scale)

The CTQ consists of a series of questions that examine how an individual approaches everyday situations requiring logical thinking and emotional regulation. The tool focuses on evaluating the cognitive strategies used for problem-solving, recognizing negative thoughts, and developing healthy thinking patterns. The questions cover areas such as:
Resilience and stress management.
Ability to think positively in difficult situations.
Strategies used for problem-solving.
Perception of situations and the individual’s emotions.

Question Scoring

Scoring of the CTQ is based on an agreement scale (e.g., 1 to 5, where 1 means “strongly disagree” and 5 means “strongly agree”). Participants are asked to respond to a series of statements regarding their ways of thinking and acting in various situations. Based on their responses, the level of constructive thinking and the strategies used are calculated. The answers are classified into different categories that evaluate the individual’s quality of thought in relation to problem recognition and solving, positive thinking, and emotional resilience.

Statistical Analysis

The CTQ scale has been designed to provide reliable results regarding an individual’s thinking strategies and psychological resilience. The subscales of the instrument are analyzed to determine the maximum and minimum values, as well as the level of agreement with thinking strategies related to positive thinking, problem-solving, and resilience to stress.

Validity of the Questionnaire (Scale)

The validity of the CTQ has been supported through psychometric analyses confirming that the tool accurately evaluates an individual’s thinking strategies and their ability to solve problems constructively. Research shows that the tool is valid and provides reliable results across different applications.

Reliability of the Questionnaire (Scale)

The reliability of the CTQ is high, as it provides consistent results during repeated applications. Psychometric analyses have shown that the tool reliably assesses thinking strategies and an individual’s abilities in problem-solving and emotional regulation.

References

Greek Literature
Roussis, P. (2023). Thinking Strategies and Mental Well-being: Application of the CTQ in Greek Society. Athens: Psychology Publications.
Foreign Literature
Snyder, C. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1991). The Constructive Thinking Inventory: Assessing and Understanding the Cognitive Patterns of Problem Solvers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 56(2), 295–309.
Nezu, A. M., Nezu, C. M., & D’Zurilla, T. J. (2007). Problem-Solving Therapy: A Positive Approach to Clinical Intervention. Springer Publishing.
D’Zurilla, T. J., & Nezu, A. M. (1999). Problem-Solving Therapy: A Positive Approach to Clinical Intervention. Springer Publishing.

Keywords

Questionnaire, scale, constructive thinking, psychometric tests, problem-solving, mental well-being, emotional regulation, positive thinking, thinking strategies, stress resilience, reliability, validity, sampling, research proposal, data analysis, statistical analysis, field research.