Questionnaire-Description

The Life Effectiveness Questionnaire (LEQ) evaluates key dimensions of life effectiveness, which are related to personal development, adaptability, and goal achievement. It includes 8 key dimensions, covering different areas of personal skills, such as:
Stress Management: The ability to manage stress.
Self-confidence: Confidence in one’s abilities.
Personal Control: The sense that one can control their life.
Goal Setting and Achievement: The ability to set and achieve goals.
Social Effectiveness: Effective social interaction.
Adaptability: The ability to adapt to new situations.
Problem-solving: The ability to solve problems effectively.
Time Management: The ability to manage time and assertive behavior.

Data Analysis and Usage

Data from the LEQ is collected through questionnaires in which participants rate their skills on a Likert scale, typically from 1 to 7, depending on the degree to which they agree or disagree with various statements.
Analyses used for processing the data include:
Factor analysis to examine the validity of the structure of the skills assessed by the scale.
Reliability analysis with the calculation of Cronbach’s alpha to assess the internal consistency of the dimensions.
Statistical techniques such as correlation analysis to examine the relationships between the dimensions of effectiveness and other variables.
The LEQ is often used in educational and organizational settings to help individuals recognize their strengths and weaknesses and improve their personal effectiveness.

Purpose

The goal of the Life Effectiveness Questionnaire (LEQ) is to assess an individual’s personal effectiveness in various areas of life. Essentially, the scale aims to evaluate a person’s ability to manage the demands and challenges of their life successfully. Additionally, it aims to help individuals identify areas where improvement is needed in order to enhance skills such as adaptability, time management, and goal achievement.

Calibration

The calibration of the LEQ involves psychometric techniques such as:
Reliability analysis, focusing on the calculation of Cronbach’s alpha to assess the internal consistency of the subscales.
Factor analysis to ensure that the scale’s questions consistently measure specific dimensions of effectiveness.
Cross-validation in different populations to confirm the scale’s validity and reliability in various contexts.

Bibliography

Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1998). Does outdoor education really work? A summary of recent meta-analyses. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 3(1), 2-9.
Neill, J. T., Marsh, H. W., & Richards, G. E. (2003). The Life Effectiveness Questionnaire: Development and psychometrics. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
Hattie, J., Marsh, H. W., Neill, J. T., & Richards, G. E. (1997). Adventure education and outward bound: Out-of-class experiences that make a lasting difference. Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 43-87.