Scale Analysis

The State Hostility Scale (SHOS) is a tool used to measure the level of hostility experienced by an individual toward a specific state. It is a self-report measure that evaluates the intensity of a person’s hostile feelings toward a particular state, such as a country, region, or city. The SHOS was developed by researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and is based on a range of factors, including perceived risk and threat, perceived hostility, and the level of perceived social distance.

Purpose

The purpose of this scale is to capture the level of hostility an individual feels toward a specific state.

Scoring

The SHOS-5 Scale consists of 5 items, rated as follows:
1 = Strongly Disagree,
2 = Disagree,
3 = Neutral,
4 = Agree,
5 = Strongly Agree.

Validity and Reliability

The SHOS is a reliable and valid measure that can provide insights into the nature of state-directed hostility and its impact on individuals and groups.

References

Anderson, C. A., Deuser, W. E., & DeNeve, K. (1995). Hot temperatures, hostile affect, hostile cognition, and arousal: Tests of a general model of affective aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 434–448.

Anderson, C. A., & Morrow, M. (1995). Competitive aggression without interaction: Effects of competitive versus cooperative instructions on aggressive behavior in video games. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 1020–1030.

Anderson, C. A., Anderson, K. B., & Deuser, W. E. (1996). Examining an affective aggression framework: Weapon and temperature effects on aggressive thoughts, affect, and attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 366–376.

Anderson, C. A. (1997). Effects of violent movies and trait irritability on hostile feelings and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 23, 161–178.

Anderson, K. B., Anderson, C. A., Dill, K. E., & Deuser, W. E. (1998). The interactive relations between trait hostility, pain, and aggressive thoughts. Aggressive Behavior, 24, 161–171.

Anderson, C. A., & Anderson, K. B. (1998). Temperature and aggression: Paradox, controversy, and a (Fairly) clear picture. In R. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 247–298). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Lindsay, J. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2000). From antecedent conditions to violent actions: A General Affective Aggression Model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 533–547.t Status of a Psychosomatic Hypothesis. Health Psychology, 11(3), 139-150.