Index Description
The Conflict Resolution – Individual Protective Factors Index (CRIPFI-12) is a tool designed to assess individual protective factors that influence a person’s ability to resolve conflicts. It includes questions evaluating various factors such as emotional intelligence, communication skills, and self-regulation, which can enhance or diminish an individual’s ability to manage conflicts effectively.
Data Analysis and Usage
Data analysis from the CRIPFI-12 involves evaluating participants’ responses on a Likert scale, typically ranging from “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree.” The data are used to understand the individual protective factors that affect conflict resolution ability. Results can provide valuable insights for developing prevention and intervention strategies, as well as for enhancing individuals’ communication and emotional management skills.
Objective
The main objective of the CRIPFI-12 is to identify and assess individual protective factors that contribute to effective conflict resolution. The tool helps in understanding how personal characteristics and abilities affect individuals’ capacity to manage and resolve conflicts in a positive manner.
Calibration
Calibration of the CRIPFI-12 is typically done using a Likert scale, which allows participants to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with statements. Scores are analyzed to determine an individual’s overall ability to manage conflicts based on the protective factors identified.
Bibliography
Benson, M. L., & Fox, G. L. (2004). Individual and contextual factors influencing conflict resolution styles in intimate relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(4), 432-449.
Thompson, L., & DeHarpport, E. (1994). The role of individual differences in conflict resolution strategies. Negotiation Journal, 10(1), 29-42.
Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Power and politics in organizations: The social psychology of conflict, coalitions, and negotiations. Jossey-Bass.
Kulik, C. T., & Roberson, L. (2008). The role of conflict resolution styles in organizational effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 381-397.
Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. (1998). Conflict resolution in organizations: A review of the literature and a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(13), 1127-1154.
 
						![Conflict Resolution – Individual Protective Factors Index [CRIPFI-12]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/aggression4-EN-250424-650x400-1.png) 
							![Work-Home Conflict Scale [WHCS-4]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/aggression4-EN-250424-650x400-1-440x264.png) 
			![The Clinical Anger Scale [CAS-21]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/aggression5-EN-250424-650x400-1-440x264.png) 
			![Conflict Avoider Style of Marriage Scale [CASMS-29]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/aggression7-EN-250424-650x400-1-440x264.png) 
			![Sex-Role Egalitarianism Scale [SRED-95]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/miscellaneous3-EN-650x400-250503-150x150.png) 
			![Active-Empathic Listening Scale [AELS-11]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/miscellaneous2-EN-650x400-250503-150x150.png) 
			![Constant Work Rate cycle Test [CWRCT-1]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/miscellaneous5-EN-650x400-250503-150x150.png) 
			![Cardiac Anxiety Questionnaire [CAQ-10]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/miscellaneous6-EN-650x400-250503-150x150.png) 
			![Brief Aggression Questionnaire [BAQ-12]](https://statistics.datanalysis.net/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/miscellaneous1-EN-650x400-250503-150x150.png)