Tool-Description
The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R-5) is a cognitive assessment tool used for diagnosing and monitoring cognitive disorders, such as dementia. The ACE-R-5 is a revised version of the original Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-R) and is designed to be more compact and efficient in assessing key cognitive areas.
Analysis and Data Usage
The ACE-R-5 includes various sections that evaluate different aspects of cognitive function, such as memory, attention, orientation, language, and executive function. The main categories are:
Orientation: Assesses the individual’s ability to recognize time, place, and self.
Memory: Includes immediate and delayed recall of information.
Language: Evaluates language use and comprehension, such as repetition, understanding commands, and naming objects.
Executive Function: Examines the individual’s ability to plan, organize, and solve problems.
Assessments are made based on the individual’s performance in these areas, aiming to detect any cognitive impairments or disorders.
Purpose
The main goal of ACE-R-5 is to assess cognitive function and diagnose cognitive disorders, such as dementia and other cognitive impairments. The tool helps understand the level of cognitive decline and monitor the patient’s condition over time.
Scoring
The ACE-R-5 provides scores for each section of the examination, and the total scores can be used to estimate the overall cognitive function of the individual. Scores are compared with predefined diagnostic criteria and research guidelines to determine if there are abnormalities or deficiencies.
Bibliography
Mioshi, E., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., & Arnold, R. (2006). “Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R)”. Psychological Medicine, 36(2), 167-175.
Hodges, J. R., & Mioshi, E. (2008). “The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination”. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 79(1), 115-119.
Hodges, J. R., & McCarthy, R. A. (2008). “The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination: A New Instrument for Diagnosing Dementia”. Neuropsychology Review, 18(4), 293-306.