Description

The Vancouver Index of Acculturation (VIA-20) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess acculturation in multicultural populations. It measures an individual’s orientation towards their heritage culture as well as towards the mainstream culture of the host society. The VIA-20 is widely used in research to explore how individuals balance the cultural influences of their heritage with those of the society they live in.

Analysis and Data Use

Data from the VIA-20 can be analyzed using various statistical techniques to understand the degree of acculturation among individuals or groups. The index generates two primary scores: one for heritage culture orientation and one for mainstream culture orientation. These scores can be used to classify individuals into different acculturation strategies, such as integration, assimilation, separation, or marginalization.
Common statistical analyses include:
Descriptive Statistics: To summarize the overall acculturation levels within a sample, providing mean scores, standard deviations, and ranges for both heritage and mainstream orientations.
Correlation Analysis: To examine the relationship between acculturation and other variables such as mental health outcomes, identity, or social integration.
Factor Analysis: To validate the factor structure of the VIA-20, ensuring that the items load appropriately onto the two expected dimensions (heritage and mainstream orientation).
Regression Analysis: To predict outcomes based on acculturation scores, such as predicting levels of well-being or academic achievement based on an individual’s orientation towards heritage or mainstream culture.
Cluster Analysis: To identify distinct acculturation profiles within a population based on VIA-20 scores.

Objective

The main objective when using the VIA-20 in research is to calibrate the index to specific populations or cultural contexts. This involves ensuring that the questionnaire is valid and reliable across different cultural groups, which may require translation and back-translation procedures, as well as psychometric testing. The goal is to obtain accurate measurements of acculturation that can be used to inform interventions, policy-making, or further research into multicultural experiences.

Bibliography

Ryder, A. G., Alden, L. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2000). Is acculturation unidimensional or bidimensional? A head-to-head comparison in the prediction of personality, self-identity, and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 49–65. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.49
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist, 65(4), 237-251. doi:10.1037/a0019330
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5-34. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
Ward, C., & Kennedy, A. (1994). Acculturation strategies, psychological adjustment, and sociocultural competence during cross-cultural transitions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18(3), 329-343. doi:10.1016/0147-1767(94)90036-1
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7(2), 156-176. doi:10.1177/074355489272003