Evaluation-Description

The PMIFE is a scale designed to capture levels of physical and mental impairment in various health conditions, such as chronic illnesses, injuries, or mental disorders. The questionnaire includes a series of questions related to:

The ability to perform daily activities (e.g., personal care, work, social activities).

Physical functioning (e.g., mobility, pain, endurance).

Mental functioning (e.g., concentration, emotional stability, memory).

The scale assesses both the immediate and long-term effects of a condition, providing a comprehensive picture of an individual’s functionality.

Data Analysis and Usage

The data collected from the PMIFE provides a detailed view of an individual’s physical and mental functioning. Participant responses are typically rated on a Likert scale, allowing for the quantification of different levels of impairment.

Statistical analyses used on the data include:

Reliability analysis, such as calculating Cronbach’s alpha, to ensure consistency in the responses.

Factor analysis to confirm the scale’s structures and identify the main dimensions affected by physical and mental impairments.

Comparative analysis to explore differences in functioning between various groups (e.g., based on illness, age, or gender).

Purpsoe

The primary goal of the Physical and Mental Impairment-of-Function Evaluation (PMIFE) is to assess how physical and mental health affects an individual’s functionality. Through this scale, it aims to:

Evaluate the extent of the impact of a health condition on daily life and overall well-being.

Monitor changes in functioning following therapeutic interventions.

Provide data for the development of rehabilitation programs and the adaptation of treatment to meet each individual’s needs.

Calibration

The calibration of the PMIFE involves the following steps:

Reliability analysis to calculate the internal consistency of the questions, ensuring that the various elements of the scale accurately assess physical and mental impacts.

Confirmatory factor analysis to validate the structure of the scale and identify the main dimensions (physical and mental) being evaluated.

Validation of the scale across different populations to ensure that the results are generalizable and reliable.

Bibliography

Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473-483.

Stewart, A. L., & Ware, J. E. (Eds.). (1992). Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Duke University Press.

Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: Self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3), 179-186.