Tool-Description


The Clinical Simulation Evaluation Tool [CSET-18] is a tool designed to assess the effectiveness and quality of clinical simulations. It consists of 18 items covering various aspects of clinical simulations, such as realism, educational value, and the usefulness of scenarios. The tool is used to evaluate participant performance and the quality of simulations to enhance the educational process.

Data Analysis and Use


Data Analysis:
Data Collection:
Questionnaire Completion: The CSET-18 is typically completed by participants in clinical simulations, either voluntarily or under researcher supervision.
Collection and Recording: Data is collected through printed or electronic questionnaires. Responses are recorded in databases for analysis.
Data Processing:
Response Coding: Responses are numerically coded, e.g., from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good).
Score Aggregation: Total scores are calculated for each participant and for groups, to compare and analyze results.
Statistical Analysis:
Descriptive Statistics: Basic descriptive statistics, such as means, medians, and standard deviations, are calculated to assess the distribution of responses.
Comparative Analysis: Scores are compared across different groups (e.g., gender, educational level) to identify any differences or trends.
Systematic Analysis: Advanced statistical methods, such as factor analysis or multiple regression, are applied to examine underlying dimensions and relationships between items.
Result Interpretation:
Quality Assessment: Average scores and distributions are interpreted to understand the main aspects of simulation quality.
Trend Identification: Differences between various groups are analyzed to identify potential trends or preferences.
Data Use:
Research Studies:
Understanding Effectiveness: Used to understand the effectiveness of clinical simulations and areas needing improvement.
Theory Development: Contributes to developing theories related to the best practices in clinical simulation.
Interventions and Policies:
Intervention Strategies: Helps in designing and implementing strategies to enhance simulation quality and effectiveness.
Educational Programs: Informs the development of educational programs and pedagogical initiatives for improving clinical education.
Comparative Analysis:
International Comparison: Allows comparison of simulation quality and performance between different clinical education programs or countries.
Social Policy:
Policy Creation: Informs social policy and strategies for promoting effective clinical education and simulation practices.

Purpose


The primary goal of the Clinical Simulation Evaluation Tool [CSET-18] is to identify and evaluate the quality and effectiveness of clinical simulations. Its aim is to provide data that can be used to enhance clinical education and develop interventions to improve the simulation process.

Calibration


The calibration of the Clinical Simulation Evaluation Tool [CSET-18] involves determining the validity and reliability of the tool. This typically includes conducting pilot studies to assess the clarity of the items and the consistency of responses. Calibration ensures that the resulting scores are accurate and correctly represent the quality of clinical simulations.

Bibliography


Lavallee, L. F., Hatch, P. M., Michalos, A. C., & McKinley, T. (2007). Development of the contentment with life assessment scale (CLAS): Using daily life experiences to verify levels of self-reported life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 83, 201-244.
Smith, J. R., & Williams, H. (1998). Development and Validation of the Anti-Semitism Scale [A-S-52]. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 250-265. DOI: 10.1080/00224549809600346
Johnson, L. M., & Davis, R. (2001). Psychometric Properties of the Anti-Semitism Scale: A Comprehensive Review. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 162-174. DOI: 10.1080/07481756.2001.120690