Description

The Battery for Health and Illness (BHI) is a psychometric tool designed to assess various dimensions of health and illness. The BHI includes questions and indicators that cover physical, psychological, and social aspects of health, aiming to provide a comprehensive view of an individual’s health status. This tool is used in clinical, research, and practical settings to measure health and illness.

Data Analysis and Use

The analysis of data from the BHI involves quantitative and qualitative techniques for evaluating health and illness dimensions. The analysis process includes:
Descriptive Statistics:Means and Standard Deviations: Calculating the means and standard deviations of responses for each question or for the subscales of the tool.
Reliability: Assessing the internal consistency of the tool using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure the reliability of the results.
Correlations:Examining Correlations: Exploring correlations between scores on different aspects of health and illness to understand their interrelationships.
Factor Analysis:Using Factor Analyses: Identifying key factors that influence health and illness dimensions, if necessary.

Objective

The main goal of the BHI is to provide a reliable tool for assessing dimensions of health and illness. It is used for:
Research Purposes: Studying the relationships between health and illness with other psychological and social variables.
Clinical Assessment: Evaluating individuals’ health status and designing interventions to improve health.
Health Policy: Developing strategies and policies that address population health needs.

Calibration

The calibration of the BHI involves analyzing the data obtained from using the scale:
Internal Consistency Assessment: Calculating the reliability of the tool using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure the consistency of responses.
Comparative Analysis: Comparing the results with data from other relevant studies to confirm the validity and reliability of the tool.

Bibliography

Burnam, M.A., Hough, R.L., Telles, C.A., & Escobar, J.I. (1987). Measurement of acculturation in a community population of Mexican Americans. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 105–130.
Clark, L. (2002). Mexican-Origin mothers’ experiences using children’s health care services. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 24, 159–179.
Davis, L.E., & Engel, R.J. (2011). Measuring Race and Ethnicity. New York, NY: Springer.
McCubbin, H.I., & Patterson, J. (1983). Family Member Well-being Index (FMWB). In McCubbin, H.I., Thompson, A.I., & McCubbin, M.A. (Eds.) (1996). Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice, pp. 753-782. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
McCubbin, H.I., Thompson, A.I., Thompson, E.A., Elver, K.M., & McCubbin, M.A. (1998). Ethnicity, schema and coherence: Appraisal processes for families in crisis. In McCubbin, H.I., Thompson, E.A., Thompson, A.I., & Fromer, J.E. (Eds.) Stress, coping and health in families: Sense of coherence and resiliency, pp. 41-67.
McCubbin, H.I., Thompson, A.I., Elver, K.M., & Carpenter, K. (1992). Family Schema-Ethnic (FSCH-E). In McCubbin, H.I., Thompson, A.I., & McCubbin, M.A. (Eds.) (1996). Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice, pp. 713-721. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin.
McCubbin, L.D., & McCubbin, H.I. (2005). Culture and ethnic identity in family resilience: Dynamic processes in trauma and transformation of Indigenous People. In Unger, M. (Ed.) Pathways to Resilience, pp. 27-44. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.