Description

The General Functioning 12-item Subscale is a tool designed to assess the overall functioning of individuals or systems within a specific context. This subscale is used to evaluate how well an individual or system operates, addressing areas such as emotional health, problem-solving abilities, and overall well-being. It provides a snapshot of general functioning by focusing on a set of 12 key items.

Data Analysis and Usage

The analysis of data from the General Functioning 12-item Subscale involves:

Data Collection: Gathering responses based on the 12-item subscale from participants or subjects to assess their general functioning.

Scoring: Each item is rated, and scores are calculated to reflect the overall level of functioning. The aggregate score provides a measure of general functioning across the assessed dimensions.

Data Interpretation: Analyzing scores to identify patterns or areas of concern related to general functioning. This helps in understanding the effectiveness of interventions or the need for further assessment.

Application: The results can be used by mental health professionals, researchers, and practitioners to evaluate general functioning and to inform treatment planning, intervention strategies, or further research.

Objectives

The main objectives of the General Functioning 12-item Subscale are:

Assessment of Overall Functioning: To provide a comprehensive evaluation of an individual’s or system’s general functioning.

Identification of Strengths and Challenges: To pinpoint specific areas of strength or difficulty within the general functioning domain.

Informed Decision-Making: To guide decision-making processes related to interventions, support strategies, and further evaluations.

Calibration

The calibration of the General Functioning 12-item Subscale includes:

Scoring: Items are scored based on a predefined rating system, and the overall functioning score is derived from the aggregate of these item scores.

Statistical Analysis: Data is analyzed for reliability and validity to ensure accurate measurement of general functioning. This includes checking consistency in responses and the effectiveness of the subscale.

Normative Data: Scores are compared against normative data or benchmarks to interpret general functioning levels relative to a larger population.

Bibliography

McCubbin, H. I., & Patterson, J. M. (1983). The Family Stress Process: Theoretical Model and Research Directions.

Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device.

Kellner, R. (1987). The Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R): A Comprehensive Measure of Psychological Symptoms.

Patterson, J. M. (1988). Families experiencing stress: Theoretical framework and clinical implications.

Hoagwood, K., & Erwin, H. (1997). The Family Functioning Assessment Scale: A Review and Application.