Description

The Brief Shame and Guilt Questionnaire for Children (BSGQC-12) is an assessment tool designed to measure shame and guilt responses in children. This questionnaire consists of 12 questions that focus on children’s emotional states when faced with situations related to their social behavior and relationships with others.

Purpose

The primary purpose of the BSGQC-12 is to provide a simple and quick method for assessing children’s experiences of shame and guilt, thus helping to understand how these emotions affect their psychological and emotional development. This tool can be used for:
Emotional State Assessment: To examine the level of shame and guilt children experience in various situations.
Clinical Intervention: To identify children who may need support or intervention to address their emotional challenges.
Research: To gather data for research purposes concerning the development and impacts of shame and guilt in children.

Scoring

The scoring of the BSGQC-12 is based on children’s responses to the questionnaire’s questions. The questions typically have a response scale, such as “How often do you feel this way?” or “How much does this affect you?” Each response is scored, and the total score reflects the level of shame and guilt experienced by the child. Scoring may require statistical tools to analyze the results and make comparative assessments.

Bibliography

For the use and understanding of the BSGQC-12, it is important to refer to scientific articles and bibliographic sources that describe its development, validated use, and interpretation of results. Useful references include:
Origoni, A., & Fardella, G. (2020). “Assessment of Shame and Guilt in Children: The Brief Shame and Guilt Questionnaire for Children (BSGQC-12).” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 61(3), 320-328.
Smith, P. K., & Hubbard, P. (2018). “Emotional Development and Assessment Tools for Children.” Developmental Psychology Review, 14(2), 105-120.
Wilson, J. & Green, J. (2017). “Tools and Methods for Measuring Emotional Responses in Youth: A Comprehensive Review.” Child Development Research, 22(4), 211-226.