Masculine Gender Identity Scale for Females [MGISF]
Analysis
The Masculine Gender Identity Scale for Females (MGISF) is described in the available source as a psychometric instrument designed to assess the extent to which women incorporate characteristics associated with masculine gender identity. The scale examines behaviors, attitudes, and self-perceptions traditionally or socially associated with masculinity and explores how these characteristics are expressed in women.
The instrument is based on the view that gender identity and gender expression may include a broad range of characteristics and behaviors that are not necessarily restricted to rigid binary patterns. By assessing relevant attitudes and self-perceptions, the scale aims to capture individual differences in the degree to which masculine-associated characteristics are incorporated into the individual’s self-concept.
Objective
According to the source document, the MGISF has four main objectives.
First, it aims to support the understanding of gender identity by examining how women perceive and express characteristics associated with masculine gender identity within their personality.
Second, it seeks to enhance self-awareness regarding the multidimensional expression of gender identity.
Third, it aims to examine social and cultural norms and how these may influence women’s perceptions and expressions of gender identity.
Fourth, the source document identifies the potential use of the scale in supporting therapeutic interventions that promote self-acceptance and greater flexibility in relation to gender identity.
Scoring
According to the available source, the MGISF is scored using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants indicate their level of agreement with statements concerning behaviors and perceptions associated with masculine gender identity.
The response scale ranges from:
1 = Not at all in agreement
to
5 = Strongly in agreement
Total scores are interpreted as reflecting the degree to which the respondent incorporates or identifies with the characteristics assessed by the instrument. Higher scores indicate greater incorporation of these characteristics, whereas lower scores indicate a lower degree of incorporation.
The available source does not provide information regarding the exact number of items, possible subscales, official cut-off values, or psychometric coefficients such as Cronbach’s alpha. Therefore, these characteristics cannot be documented from the source material provided.
Use of Results
According to the framework presented in the source document, MGISF results may be used to explore individual differences in perceptions and expressions of gender identity and to investigate how social and cultural norms are related to self-perception.
In research settings, scores may also be examined in relation to variables such as social attitudes, cultural context, and personality characteristics, provided that such analyses are consistent with the study design.
References
Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. (1978). Masculinity & Femininity: Their Psychological Dimensions, Correlates, & Antecedents. University of Texas Press.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.
Pleck, J. H. (1981). The Myth of Masculinity. MIT Press.
Twenge, J. M. (1997). Changes in masculine and feminine traits over time: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 36(5–6), 305–325.
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2015). Two traditions of research on gender identity. Sex Roles, 73(11–12), 461–473.