Description

The Feedback Instrument for Rescue Force Development – Exercises for Independent Work (FIRE-EV-4) is an evaluation instrument designed to systematically assess the effectiveness of independent learning exercises performed by members of rescue forces. The tool collects information regarding important aspects of self-directed training activities, including the development of professional skills, clarity of training instructions, ability to apply acquired knowledge in practical situations, and participants’ overall satisfaction with the independent learning process.

The evaluation of these dimensions contributes to the improvement of training design and the quality of educational activities conducted outside the traditional instructional environment. By assessing participants’ experiences and perceptions, the FIRE-EV-4 provides useful feedback for optimizing independent training activities and strengthening the effectiveness of rescue force development programs.

Purpose

The primary purpose of the FIRE-EV-4 is to collect structured feedback from participants regarding the effectiveness of independent work exercises within rescue force training programs.

The results obtained through the instrument can be used to improve the quality of educational materials, enhance self-directed learning activities, and increase the effectiveness of training procedures for rescue personnel.

Through systematic evaluation of independent learning experiences, the FIRE-EV-4 supports the identification of strengths and areas requiring improvement, contributing to the development of more efficient and learner-centered training approaches.

Structure and Characteristics of the Scale

The FIRE-EV-4 consists of 4 items designed to evaluate fundamental aspects of independent training exercises used in rescue force development.

The statements focus on the development of practical skills, the clarity of training instructions, the ability to transfer acquired knowledge into real-world applications, and overall satisfaction with the independent learning experience.

Participants respond to each statement using a five-point Likert scale, with response options ranging from:

1 = Strongly Disagree
5 = Strongly Agree

Higher scores indicate more positive perceptions regarding the usefulness, effectiveness, and quality of independent training exercises.

The available material does not provide information regarding the existence of specific subscales or the distribution of items across different dimensions.

Data Analysis and Use of the Data

The analysis of FIRE-EV-4 data focuses on evaluating the quality and effectiveness of independent work exercises incorporated into rescue force training.

The results allow the assessment of the usefulness of independent activities, clarity of educational instructions, transferability of acquired knowledge into practical contexts, and participants’ overall satisfaction.

The information obtained through the instrument can be used to improve instructional design, develop more effective self-directed learning activities, and ensure quality improvement in professional training programs for rescue personnel.

The FIRE-EV-4 may support training organizations in identifying whether independent learning components successfully contribute to skill development and operational preparedness.

Validity and Reliability / Psychometric Characteristics

The available documentation describes the purpose, structure, and scoring procedure of the FIRE-EV-4, but it does not provide specific psychometric characteristics of the instrument.

No information is reported regarding Cronbach’s α values, exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis results, test–retest reliability indicators, or specific validity measures.

Therefore, based on the available material, specific numerical psychometric indicators of the FIRE-EV-4 cannot be presented. Additional empirical evaluation would be required to determine the reliability, validity, and broader applicability of the instrument in different rescue training environments.

Scoring and Statistical Evaluation

The scoring of the FIRE-EV-4 is performed using a five-point Likert scale, where responses range from:

1 = Strongly Disagree
5 = Strongly Agree

The individual item scores can be combined to provide an overall evaluation of the effectiveness of independent work exercises and the participants’ learning experience.

Higher scores indicate more positive evaluations of the independent training process, including greater perceived usefulness of the activities, clarity of instructions, practical applicability of knowledge, and satisfaction with the learning experience.

The available material does not provide information regarding the calculation method of the total score, cut-off values, or predefined categories for interpretation of results. Therefore, the interpretation of scores depends on the objectives and methodology of each individual evaluation study.

Applications

The Feedback Instrument for Rescue Force Development – Exercises for Independent Work (FIRE-EV-4) can be used for evaluating self-directed learning activities within rescue force training programs.

The instrument is particularly useful in professional education environments where independent practice, continuous skill development, and learner autonomy are essential components of training.

Its applications include the evaluation of independent training exercises, assessment of educational material effectiveness, improvement of self-learning methodologies, identification of participants’ training needs, and support of quality assurance processes in rescue personnel development.

By providing structured feedback on independent learning experiences, the FIRE-EV-4 contributes to the continuous improvement of rescue training systems and supports the development of personnel with enhanced practical skills and operational readiness.

References

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.

Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee Training and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.