Description

The Feedback Instrument for Rescue Force Development – Emergency Training (FIRE-E-4) is an evaluation instrument designed for the systematic assessment of the effectiveness of emergency training programs addressed to rescue forces. The tool collects information regarding critical aspects of the training process, including the development of emergency response skills, knowledge of operational protocols, safety during training activities, and participants’ overall satisfaction with the educational program.

The systematic utilization of the results contributes to the continuous improvement of training quality and supports the enhancement of operational readiness among rescue teams. By evaluating participants’ perceptions of emergency training effectiveness, the instrument provides valuable feedback for improving educational procedures and strengthening preparedness for emergency response situations.

Purpose

The primary purpose of the FIRE-E-4 is to collect structured feedback from participants involved in emergency training programs for rescue forces.

The collected data are used to evaluate and continuously improve the quality of training, enhance the effectiveness of educational programs, and increase trainee satisfaction. Through this process, the instrument supports the development of more efficient and targeted training procedures that meet the operational requirements of rescue personnel.

The FIRE-E-4 contributes to the identification of strengths and potential areas for improvement within emergency training programs, supporting evidence-based decisions regarding the organization and delivery of professional training.

Structure and Characteristics of the Scale

The FIRE-E-4 consists of 4 items designed to evaluate fundamental dimensions of emergency training for rescue forces.

The statements focus on key aspects of emergency preparedness, including the acquisition of emergency response skills, understanding of operational protocols, safety during the training process, and overall satisfaction with the training program.

Participants respond to each statement using a five-point Likert scale, with response options ranging from:

1 = Strongly Disagree
5 = Strongly Agree

Higher scores indicate more positive perceptions regarding the effectiveness and quality of the emergency training program.

The available material does not provide information regarding the existence of specific subscales or the internal organization of the items across different dimensions.

Data Analysis and Use of the Data

The analysis of FIRE-E-4 data focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of emergency training programs designed for rescue forces.

The results allow the assessment of the quality of training, the adequacy of acquired emergency response skills, the understanding of operational procedures, and the overall satisfaction of trainees.

The instrument can be used for the evaluation of training interventions, the improvement of educational processes, and quality assurance in the professional preparation of personnel involved in emergency management and rescue operations.

The collected feedback may support training organizations in identifying educational needs, improving instructional strategies, and ensuring that emergency response personnel receive effective and relevant preparation.

Validity and Reliability / Psychometric Characteristics

The available documentation describes the purpose, structure, and scoring procedure of the FIRE-E-4, but it does not include specific psychometric characteristics of the instrument.

No information is provided regarding Cronbach’s α values, exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis results, test–retest reliability indicators, or specific validity measures.

Therefore, based on the available material, specific numerical psychometric indicators of the FIRE-E-4 cannot be presented. Further empirical evaluation would be required to establish the reliability, construct validity, and broader applicability of the instrument across different emergency training contexts.

Scoring and Statistical Evaluation

The scoring of the FIRE-E-4 is performed using a five-point Likert scale, where responses range from:

1 = Strongly Disagree
5 = Strongly Agree

The individual item scores can be combined to provide an overall evaluation of the effectiveness and perceived quality of the emergency training program.

Higher scores indicate more positive evaluations of the educational process, including greater perceived acquisition of emergency skills, better understanding of operational protocols, improved safety conditions, and higher satisfaction with the training experience.

The available material does not provide information regarding the calculation method of the total score, cut-off values, or predefined categories for interpretation of results. Therefore, the interpretation of scores depends on the objectives and methodology of each individual evaluation study.

Applications

The Feedback Instrument for Rescue Force Development – Emergency Training (FIRE-E-4) can be applied in the evaluation of emergency preparedness and professional training programs for rescue personnel.

The instrument is particularly useful in organizations responsible for emergency response, rescue operations, and crisis management training, where continuous improvement of personnel skills and operational readiness is essential.

Its applications include the assessment of emergency training effectiveness, evaluation of trainee satisfaction, improvement of educational methodologies, identification of training needs, and support of quality improvement processes in rescue force development.

By providing structured feedback regarding emergency training outcomes, the FIRE-E-4 contributes to the development of more effective training systems and supports the preparation of personnel capable of responding efficiently to emergency situations.

References

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012). The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(2), 74–101.

Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee Training and Development. McGraw-Hill Education.