Description

The Consistency of Discipline — Rochester Youth Development Study (CDRYDS-7) is a tool designed to measure the consistency and effectiveness of disciplinary practices in youth development. It focuses on how consistently discipline is applied within families or educational settings and how this consistency impacts behavioral outcomes in young individuals.
Scope: Assesses the regularity and uniformity of disciplinary actions and approaches.
Dimensions: Includes items related to the frequency, predictability, and fairness of disciplinary measures.

Data Analysis and Usage

The analysis of data from the CDRYDS-7 involves:
Data Collection: Administering the questionnaire to participants (e.g., parents, teachers, or guardians) to gather information about disciplinary practices.
Scoring: Each response is scored to reflect the level of consistency in disciplinary practices, with higher scores indicating more consistent discipline.
Interpretation: Analyzing the scores to assess the overall consistency of discipline and its impact on youth behavior and development.
Application: Using the results to identify areas for improvement in disciplinary practices and to develop strategies for more effective and consistent discipline.

Objectives

The main objectives of the Consistency of Discipline — Rochester Youth Development Study (CDRYDS-7) are:
Assessment of Discipline Consistency: To evaluate how consistently disciplinary practices are applied and whether there are any discrepancies.
Behavioral Outcomes: To understand the relationship between discipline consistency and behavioral outcomes in youth, such as academic performance, social behavior, and emotional well-being.
Guidance for Improvement: To provide insights for parents, educators, and policymakers on how to enhance disciplinary practices for better developmental outcomes.

Calibration

The calibration of the CDRYDS-7 includes:
Scoring: Responses are scored based on the consistency and effectiveness of the disciplinary measures reported.
Statistical Analysis: Analyzing the data for reliability and validity of the scale, and comparing results with normative data to interpret the level of discipline consistency.
Normative Data: Using normative data to benchmark and compare individual or group scores to understand how they align with established standards.

Bibliography

Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-2).
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the Context of the Family: Parent-Child Interaction.
Steinberg, L., Lamborn, S. D., Dornbusch, S. M., & Darling, N. (1992). Impact of Parenting Practices on Adolescent Achievement and Adjustment.
Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive Family Process.
Rochester Youth Development Study Team (2002). The Rochester Youth Development Study: A Study of Youth Behavior and Development.