Form Description

The Relationship Rating Form (TRRF) is an assessment tool used for analyzing and evaluating the relationships between two or more individuals. It is designed to provide a quantitative assessment of the qualitative aspects of a relationship, such as trust, communication, support, and cohesion.

Data Analysis and Usage

Analyzing a relationship using the TRRF involves several steps:

  1. Data Collection: Participants complete the form, providing answers to a series of questions related to their relationship.
  2. Quantitative Assessment: Responses are scored using a Likert scale or other appropriate quantitative evaluation method.
  3. Statistical Analysis: The data is statistically analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and significant findings.
  4. Result Interpretation: The results are interpreted to provide a clear picture of the quality and dynamics of the relationship.

Purpose

The primary goal of the TRRF is to identify and measure the dynamics of a relationship, allowing participants to better understand their relationship’s strengths and weaknesses. This tool can be used in various contexts, such as family relationships, friendships, professional relationships, and therapeutic relationships. Objectives include:

  • Assessment of Relationship Quality: To understand the overall quality and dynamics of the relationship.
  • Identification of Problematic Areas: To recognize specific issues that may require attention or intervention.
  • Monitoring Relationship Progress: To track progress and changes in the relationship over time.

Calibration

The calibration of the TRRF involves the use of statistical methods to ensure the reliability and validity of the tool. This process includes:

  • Reliability Confirmation: Examining the consistency of responses using indicators such as Cronbach’s alpha.
  • Validity Confirmation: Assessing whether the tool actually measures the aspects of the relationship it is supposed to measure, through content, criterion, and construct validation checks.
  • Ongoing Revision: Regular review and adjustment of the tool based on new research and data to maintain accuracy and relevance.

Bibliography

Spanier, G.B. (1976). “Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: New Scales for Assessing the Quality of Marriage and Similar Dyads.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 38(1), 15-28.

Hendrick, S. S. (1988). “A Generic Measure of Relationship Satisfaction.” Journal of Marriage and Family, 50(1), 93-98.

Rusbult, C. E., Martz, J. M., & Agnew, C. R. (1998). “The Investment Model Scale: Measuring Commitment Level, Satisfaction Level, Quality of Alternatives, and Investment Size.” Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357-391.

Funk, J. L., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). “Testing the Ruler with Item Response Theory: Increasing Precision of Measurement for Relationship Satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index.” Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572-583.

Spanier, G. B., & Cole, C. L. (1976). “Toward Clarification and Investigation of Marital Adjustment.” International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 6(2), 121-146.