Analysis

The analysis of the data obtained from the questionnaire includes the evaluation of the responses based on standardized scales. The analysis incorporates statistical methods for measuring the mean value, variance, and correlations between different parameters. Additionally, comparative methods may be used to assess differences in satisfaction and motivation among different groups of teachers, for example, based on their experience or job position. The purpose is to understand the factors that influence overall teacher satisfaction and motivation.

Objective

The primary objective of the questionnaire is to identify the factors that affect the professional satisfaction and motivation of teachers. Understanding these factors can lead to strategies for improving working conditions, professional development, and the overall well-being of teachers. The ultimate goal is to enhance the quality of education by improving teacher satisfaction and motivation.

Calibration

The calibration of the questionnaire is conducted through the application of statistical techniques that ensure the validity and reliability of the results. This includes the use of standardized Likert scales for evaluating the responses, aiming to extract quantitative data that can be compared and analyzed. The data are scored according to the questionnaire standards and compared with a database of previous research to create comparative indicators and identify trends.

Bibliography

Mertler, C. A. (1992). Teacher motivation and job satisfaction of public school teachers. Unpublished master’s thesis, Ohio State University.
Mertler, C. A. (2001). Teacher Motivation and Job Satisfaction in the New Millennium. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED461649.pdf
Mertler, C. A. (2002). Job Satisfaction and Perception of Motivation among Middle and High School Teachers. American Secondary Education, 31(1); 43-53.