Analysis

The analysis of the Justice Scale involves evaluating the reliability and validity of the tool. The reliability of the scale is assessed using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure the consistency of responses. In addition, test–retest reliability is measured through successive assessments to confirm the stability of responses. The validity of the tool is examined through comparative studies with other measures of justice, as well as through factor analyses to confirm the structure of the dimensions assessed by the Justice Scale.

Objective

The objective of the Justice Scale is to provide a reliable and valid means of assessing individuals’ perceptions of justice in various contexts, such as the workplace, education, and society in general. This tool is used in social research to study the impact of justice on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, performance, and mental health. It is also useful in organizational psychology and sociology for developing interventions aimed at strengthening perceptions of justice.

Calibration

The Justice Scale is calibrated using a Likert scale, where responses range from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), depending on the degree of agreement with the questionnaire statements. Total scores are calculated by summing the individual item scores for each dimension of justice. Higher scores indicate stronger perceptions of justice.

References

The literature on the Justice Scale includes important studies that document the development and validation of the tool. One of the key sources is the work of Colquitt (2001), published in the Journal of Applied Psychology, which analyzes the development of the scale and evaluates its psychometric reliability and validity. In addition, the work of Greenberg (1990) examines the theoretical foundations of organizational justice and its effects on organizational behaviors, supporting the usefulness of the Justice Scale in research and practice.