Description of the Questionnaire
The Neighborhood Disorganization Scale is a tool for measuring the degree of social disorganization in a neighborhood. It includes questions related to physical disorder, such as abandoned buildings, graffiti, and litter, social disorder, such as gangs, drug use, and prostitution, as well as economic deprivation, such as high unemployment and poverty. The questionnaire aims to capture the level of Neighborhood Disorganization Scale
Description
The Neighborhood Disorganization Scale is an assessment instrument designed to measure perceived levels of social and environmental disorganization within a neighborhood. It is grounded in the theoretical perspective of social disorganization, according to which certain characteristics of the local social and physical environment may be associated with higher levels of crime, social problems, and reduced community cohesion.
The scale assesses a broad range of conditions related to physical deterioration, social disorder, crime, and economic deprivation. These include unemployment, vandalism, abandoned or poorly maintained buildings, theft, assaults, gang activity, public drug use or dealing, and other indicators of neighborhood-level social disruption.
Aim
The primary aim of the scale is to quantify the extent to which residents perceive their neighborhood as socially disorganized, unsafe, or environmentally disadvantaged. By assessing multiple aspects of the local environment, the instrument provides an overall indication of neighborhood conditions and perceived community functioning.
The scale may also be used to compare different neighborhoods, identify communities experiencing greater social or environmental difficulties, and support the development of targeted prevention, community support, and neighborhood improvement interventions.
Structure and Content
The scale consists of 17 items, each asking respondents to indicate the extent to which a particular condition represents a problem in their neighborhood. The areas assessed include high unemployment, tensions between social or cultural groups, vandalism, disregard for rules and authority, prostitution, abandoned buildings, sexual assault, burglary and theft, gambling, deteriorated buildings and yards, organized crime, assaults and muggings, gang activity, homelessness, open drug use or drug dealing, and the buying or selling of stolen goods.
Some of the wording used in the original instrument reflects the historical period in which it was developed and includes terminology that may now be considered stigmatizing or insufficiently inclusive. In contemporary applications, researchers should therefore carefully consider linguistic and cultural adaptation while preserving the conceptual meaning and psychometric integrity of the original measure.
Scoring
Each item is rated using a three-point response scale:
A big problem = 3
Sort of a problem = 2
Not a problem = 1
Item scores are summed and then divided by the number of completed items. The intended overall score ranges from 1 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater perceived neighborhood crime, physical deterioration, and social disorganization.
Applications
The Neighborhood Disorganization Scale can be applied in research in social epidemiology, public health, criminology, community psychology, sociology, and related fields. It is particularly relevant to studies examining associations between neighborhood characteristics and outcomes such as perceived safety, psychological well-being, social cohesion, delinquency, quality of life, and exposure to social or environmental stressors.
The instrument may also contribute to the identification of communities with greater intervention needs and support the planning of policies and community-based initiatives aimed at improving neighborhood conditions, strengthening social cohesion, and reducing violence and crime.
Conclusions
The Neighborhood Disorganization Scale provides a brief and structured method for assessing residents’ perceptions of neighborhood-level social and environmental disorganization. By incorporating indicators of both physical and social disorder, the scale can contribute to a broader understanding of how the local living environment may relate to safety, community functioning, and residents’ well-being.
When used in contemporary research, particular attention should be given to cultural adaptation, updated and non-stigmatizing terminology, and psychometric evaluation of translated or modified versions of the scale.
References
Thornberry, T. P., Krohn, M. D., Lizotte, A. J., Smith, C. A., & Tobin, K. (2003). Gangs and Delinquency in Developmental Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Measuring Violence-Related Attitudes, Behaviors, and Influences Among Youths: A Compendium of Assessment Tools. The instrument is presented on pages 344–345 of the compendium.