Brief Description

The task consists of 24 short stories or scenarios, each concluding with one of the characters expressing a thought or making a statement. The participant is asked to judge whether the statement makes sense, and if it does, to explain it or interpret its meaning based on the context of the story. In some cases, the statement can be interpreted metaphorically, ironically, or literally, and the participant must distinguish the type of language used and accurately infer the speaker’s intention.

Purpose

The purpose of the test is to assess the comprehension of non-literal language—specifically irony and metaphor—as well as the ability to distinguish literal from non-literal speech. It aims to evaluate social cognition skills, especially in individuals with cognitive or psychopathological difficulties, such as those with impairments in understanding others’ intentions.

Scoring Method

The number of correct responses is calculated separately for each scenario and question phase. The assessment includes four subscales based on the type of language comprehension being evaluated. The total score results from the sum of correct answers in each category, thus providing a distinct profile of literal, ironic, and metaphorical language comprehension.

Validity

The test is currently under development regarding its formal validation. However, it is based on materials used in internationally recognized studies and has a strong theoretical foundation for exploring social cognition through linguistic processes.

Reliability

The reliability of the tool is also in preparation. Measurements of internal consistency and test-retest reliability are expected to be conducted on representative samples from both the general population and individuals with disorders related to difficulties in understanding social meaning.

Data Analysis and Use

The data from the test can be used for diagnostic assessment of difficulties in language processing and social cognition. The analysis may support psychological and clinical evaluations, research protocols, and interventions aimed at improving social understanding—particularly in populations with schizotypal traits or neurodevelopmental disorders.

References

Langdon, R., & Coltheart, M. (2004). Recognition of metaphor and irony in young adults: the impact of schizotypal personality traits. Psychiatry Research, 125, 9–20.