Description

The Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS) is a tool designed to assess the multidimensional nature of perfectionism. Developed by Frost et al. (1990), it aims to measure various aspects of perfectionism that influence an individual’s personality and behavior.

The FMPS consists of 35 items that evaluate five core dimensions of perfectionism:
Concern over Mistakes: Emotional distress and concern over potential errors or failures.
Personal Standards: The level of demands and expectations one sets for oneself.
Parental Criticism: The perception of being criticized by one’s parents.
Perceived Parental Expectations: How much one perceives their parents as having high expectations.
Doubts About Actions: The tendency to doubt the quality or outcome of one’s own actions.

Analysis

The analysis of the FMPS includes:
Data Collection: Participants complete the FMPS, which consists of 35 items.
Scoring: Responses are recorded and scored, typically using a Likert scale.
Data Analysis: The results are analyzed to identify levels of perfectionism across each dimension, as well as the overall perfectionism profile of the individual.
This analysis helps in understanding the complex structure of perfectionism and its influence on behavior and perceptions.

Purpose

The purpose of the FMPS is to:
Measure Perfectionism Dimensions: Provide a quantitative assessment of the various facets of perfectionism.
Evaluate Behaviors and Emotions: Examine how perfectionism impacts an individual’s emotional and behavioral patterns.
Support Interventions and Research: Offer data that can guide the development and evaluation of programs and interventions aimed at reducing maladaptive perfectionism and improving psychological well-being.

Scoring

Scoring for the FMPS involves:
Data Collection: Participants complete the scale to provide insight into their perfectionistic tendencies.
Index Calculation: Responses are scored and converted into indexes reflecting the different dimensions of perfectionism.
Validity and Reliability Assessment: The tool is evaluated for validity and reliability to ensure it accurately and consistently measures perfectionism.

References

Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14(5), 449–468.
Hewitt, P. L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfectionism in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment, and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 456–470.
Slade, P. D., & Owens, R. G. (1998). A dual process model of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6), 1191–1200.