Description

The Health Survey Questionnaire (HQ SF-12 & SF-36) is a tool that assesses the health and quality of life of individuals. It includes questions covering various aspects of physical and mental well-being, allowing for the measurement of the impacts that health conditions have on daily life.

Data Analysis and Use

The analysis of data from the HQ SF-12 and SF-36 includes:
Scoring: Results are calculated based on participants’ responses on a Likert scale, providing indicators for physical and mental health.
Statistical Analysis:
Descriptive Statistics: Calculation of means and standard deviations to understand the overall health of the population.
Correlation: Examination of the relationship between results and factors such as age, gender, and socioeconomic conditions.
Comparative Analysis: Comparison of results among different population groups to highlight differences in health and quality of life.

Objective

The objective of the HQ SF-12 and SF-36 is to provide a comprehensive picture of the health and quality of life of individuals, facilitating the assessment of the impact of various factors on their well-being and supporting health policies.

Calibration

The calibration of the HQ SF-12 and SF-36 involves the process of adapting the tool for use in different populations. This is achieved through:
Cross-Cultural Studies: Testing the tool in different cultural contexts to ensure its appropriateness.
Reliability Analysis: Using statistical tools such as Cronbach’s alpha to ensure that the questions are consistent.
Validity Testing: Checking the tool’s ability to reflect the real experiences of participants.

References

Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473-483.
McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health. Medical Care, 31(3), 247-263.
Fitzpatrick, R., & Hopkins, A. (1983). Evaluating Patient-Based Outcome Measures for Use in Routine Clinical Practice. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 17(2), 81-83.