Introduction

The concept of the knowledge gap constitutes one of the most important axes in scientific research. By its very nature, research aims at generating new knowledge, answering unresolved questions, and exploring areas that have remained uncharted. However, the task of recognizing and defining such gaps is not always straightforward. A gap identified by one researcher may already be considered addressed by another, making the process particularly demanding. Especially for young researchers and doctoral candidates, identifying a substantial gap represents both a challenge and an opportunity to contribute to the advancement of science.

Identifying the Knowledge Gap

The knowledge gap mainly appears in two cases. First, when there is a lack of sufficient theories or literature in a research field. Second, when the results of existing studies diverge from what was expected, creating new questions. In such cases, the researcher is called upon to use the gap as the foundation for developing a new research direction. The absence of data or the contradiction between findings does not simply represent a lack, but rather a source of inspiration for generating new knowledge. This is why the recognition of a gap is not a negative element but a driving force for scientific progress.

Verification of the Gap

After identifying a potential knowledge gap, the next step is verification. This process ensures that the gap truly exists and is not the result of an insufficient literature review. Scientific integrity requires the researcher to re-examine all relevant sources, to search for articles that may already address the supposed gap, and to confirm that their contribution will be original and meaningful. This process may involve thorough searches in academic databases, studying manuals, or identifying articles that cite the same references. In this way, the possibility of repeating already answered questions is reduced, while the quality of the new research is strengthened.

Writing Strategy and Formulation of the Gap

The way in which a knowledge gap is presented in the literature is of particular importance. The researcher must clearly demonstrate why the gap is significant and what dimension of science remains unexplored. For example, it can be highlighted that a previous study failed to consider specific parameters or that certain aspects of the phenomenon were examined in a limited way. The clear formulation of the gap is not only an academic requirement but also a persuasive tool that underlines the necessity of the new research. Through this perspective, the gap is transformed into a research objective that guides the study’s design.

The Role of Systematic Reviews

Systematic literature reviews are the most important tool for identifying gaps. By providing a comprehensive mapping of existing knowledge, they enable the researcher to identify what has been studied, what remains unexplored, and how they may contribute to the expansion of knowledge. Furthermore, reviews act as the foundation of so-called evidence-based research. In this way, new research acquires added value, since it does not begin from scratch but builds upon scientific experience.

Conclusions

The knowledge gap should not be perceived as a weakness but rather as an opportunity for the development of new ideas and research perspectives. Its recognition requires critical thinking, a methodical analysis of the literature, and continuous verification. Researchers, through systematic reviews and their creative thinking, can transform gaps into pillars of scientific progress. Overall, the process of identifying and utilizing knowledge gaps forms the basis for the evolution of science, as it opens up new paths and directions that would otherwise remain unexplored.