Analysis

The analysis of the SRM-SF involves the evaluation of the tool’s reliability and validity. The internal consistency of responses is assessed through statistical indicators such as Cronbach’s alpha, while the validity of the tool is examined through comparative studies with other established measures of moral reasoning. In addition, the analysis explores the SRM-SF’s ability to distinguish between different levels of moral development.

Objective

The objective of the SRM-SF is to provide a quick and reliable means of assessing individuals’ moral and social reasoning. It is used in research to better understand moral development across various populations, and it can also be applied in educational and clinical practice to evaluate and design programs that promote moral reasoning and decision-making.

Calibration

The calibration of the SRM-SF is carried out through a qualitative analysis of participants’ responses to the scenarios and questions in the instrument. Responses are coded and categorized according to Kohlberg’s levels of moral development. These scores reflect the complexity and maturity of an individual’s moral reasoning, with higher scores indicating more advanced moral reasoning.

References

The literature on the SRM-SF includes various studies that document the development and validation of the tool. An important source is the work of Gibbs, Basinger, and Fuller (1992), published in the Journal of Moral Education. This study provides an in-depth description of the development of the SRM-SF, its psychometric evaluation, and its usefulness in the study of moral development. Furthermore, Kohlberg’s (1984) theory of moral development serves as the theoretical foundation of the tool, offering a framework for understanding the stages of moral reasoning.