Analysis of the Scale

The analysis of the Powerlessness Scale usually involves the use of statistical methods to determine the reliability and validity of the scale. These methods may include factor analysis, which helps identify the underlying dimensions of the sense of powerlessness, as well as the calculation of Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient to estimate the internal consistency of the items. A high value of Cronbach’s Alpha indicates that the items of the scale consistently measure the same construct.

Purpose of the Scale

The purpose of using the Powerlessness Scale is to understand and evaluate the intensity and effects of the feeling of powerlessness in individuals. Through the scale, researchers and practitioners can identify individuals experiencing a strong sense of powerlessness and develop interventions aimed at reducing this feeling. In addition, the scale can be used to compare different populations or groups, helping to identify social or cultural factors that influence the sense of powerlessness.

Calibration of the Scale

The calibration of the Powerlessness Scale involves the use of standardized procedures to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the measurements. This usually includes defining a range of scores that represent different levels of powerlessness. The scores may be distributed into categories such as low, moderate, and high sense of powerlessness, and may be associated with specific outcomes or symptoms. The calibration process may also involve checking for differences in scores based on factors such as age, gender, or socioeconomic status.

References

Neal, A. (1959). Stratification concomitants of powerlessness and normlessness. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.
Seeman, M., & Evans, J. (1962). Alienation and learning in hospital setting. American Sociological Review, 27, 772–782.
Neal, A., & Rettig, S. (1963). Dimensions of alienation among manual and non-manual workers. American Sociological Review, 28, 599–608.
Neal, A., & Seeman, M. (1964). Organizations and powerlessness: A test of the mediation hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 29, 216–225.
Neal, A., & Rettig, S. (1967). On the multidimensionality of alienation. American Sociological Review, 3(2), 54–63.
Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1969). Measures of Political Attitudes. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.