Description

The “Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality” (BMMRS) is a brief psychometric tool developed to assess various dimensions of religiousness and spirituality. The BMMRS is designed to provide a comprehensive yet concise evaluation of religious and spiritual beliefs, practices, experiences, and influences in an individual’s life, making it easy to use in research and clinical assessments.

Goals

The main goals of the BMMRS are:
Multidimensional Assessment: To record the various dimensions of religiousness and spirituality, such as beliefs, practices, experiences, and social influences.
Ease of Use: To provide a brief tool that can be used in large-scale studies and clinical settings without burdening participants with an excessive number of questions.
Correlation with Other Variables: To investigate the relationships between dimensions of religiousness/spirituality and other psychological, social, and health-related factors.
Support for Research and Interventions: To provide data that can be used for developing research programs and interventions aimed at improving mental and spiritual well-being.

Analysis

The analysis of data collected through the BMMRS includes the following steps:
Data Collection: Participants complete a questionnaire that includes a series of brief questions evaluating the various dimensions of religiousness and spirituality.
Quantitative Evaluation: Responses are scored and analyzed statistically using descriptive statistics, factor analysis, and correlation analyses to understand dominant trends and relationships.
Interpretation of Results: The results are interpreted to identify dominant trends and relationships between different dimensions of religiousness/spirituality and other variables.
Group Comparison: Differences in the dimensions of religiousness/spirituality are examined between different demographic, cultural, and religious groups.

Calibration

The calibration of the BMMRS includes:
Ensuring Reliability: Use of reliability indicators such as Cronbach’s alpha to assess the internal consistency of responses.
Ensuring Validity: Confirmation of the tool’s validity through methods such as confirmatory factor analysis and other assessment tools.
Retest Trials: Conducting retest trials with different groups of participants to confirm the reliability and validity of the scale in various contexts.

Bibliography

Fetzer Institute/National Institute on Aging Working Group. (1999). “Multidimensional Measurement of Religiousness/Spirituality for Use in Health Research.” Fetzer Institute.
Koenig, H. G., McCullough, M. E., & Larson, D. B. (2001). “Handbook of Religion and Health.” Oxford University Press.
Idler, E. L., Musick, M. A., Ellison, C. G., George, L. K., Krause, N. M., Ory, M. G., … & Williams, D. R. (2003). “Measuring Multiple Dimensions of Religion and Spirituality for Health Research: Conceptual Background and Findings from the 1998 General Social Survey.” Research on Aging, 25(4), 327-365.
Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). “The Daily Spiritual Experience Scale: Development, Theoretical Description, Reliability, Exploratory Factor Analysis, and Preliminary Construct Validity Using Health-Related Data.” Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24(1), 22-33.
Johnstone, B., Yoon, D. P., Franklin, K. L., Schopp, L. H., & Hinkebein, J. (2008). “Reconceptualizing the Factor Structure of the Brief Multidimensional Measure of Religiousness/Spirituality.” Journal of Religion and Health, 47(4), 437-451.