Description of the Scale

The Identity Prominence and Dominance Scale (IPD-14) is a tool designed to measure the extent to which an individual’s identity is prominent and dominant in their life. The IPD-14 scale includes 14 questions that examine aspects such as the influence of identity on decisions and behaviors, self-perception, and the sense of identity within a social context. Participants respond to each statement using a Likert scale, which measures the degree of agreement or disagreement with the statements.

Data Analysis and Usage

The analysis of data from the IPD-14 involves quantitative techniques to understand the prominence and dominance of identity. The main procedures include:

Descriptive Statistics:Means and Standard Deviations: Calculation of means and standard deviations for responses to each question or subscale.

Reliability: Assessment of the internal consistency of the scale using Cronbach’s alpha to confirm the reliability of the results.

Correlations:Examination of correlations between responses to various questions or subscales to understand the relationships between different aspects of identity.

Factor Analysis:Use of factor analysis to identify key factors influencing identity prominence and dominance, if necessary.

Purpose

The primary goal of the IPD-14 is to provide a reliable tool for assessing the prominence and dominance of an individual’s identity. It is used for:

Research Purposes: Studying the relationship between identity prominence and other psychological or social variables.

Clinical Assessment: Evaluating the role of identity in personal development and behavior, and identifying the need for intervention or support.

Social Understanding: Understanding how identity affects interactions and an individual’s position in society.

Calibration

The calibration of the IPD-14 involves analyzing the data obtained from using the scale:

Assessment of Internal Consistency: Calculation of the reliability of the scale using Cronbach’s alpha to ensure the consistency of responses to the questions.

Comparative Analysis: Comparison of IPD-14 results with data from other related studies to confirm the validity and reliability of the scale.

Bibliography

Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity Theory. Oxford University Press.

Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). “The past, present, and future of an identity theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-297.

Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). “Identity theory and social identity theory.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224-237.

Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (2003). Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. Routledge.

Reitzes, D. C., & Burke, P. J. (1980). “Identity change and the transition to adulthood.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 1-13.

Oyserman, D., Elmore, K., & Smith, G. (2012). “Self, self-concept, and identity.” In Handbook of Self and Identity (pp. 69-104). Guilford Press.