Description

The Conflict Resolution—Individual Protective Factors Index (AQ-6) is designed to assess the personal characteristics and strengths that enable individuals to manage conflict effectively. It focuses on protective factors that support positive conflict resolution, such as adaptability, self-regulation, emotional stability, and resilience. The index serves as a tool for identifying how individuals respond to and cope with challenging interpersonal situations, aiming to capture their capacity for constructive engagement and resolution.

Objective

The main objective of using the AQ-6 index is to evaluate individual protective factors that contribute to effective conflict resolution. This includes assessing a person’s ability to approach conflicts with positive strategies, maintain emotional balance, adapt to dynamic situations, and demonstrate resilience in the face of adversity. By measuring these dimensions, the AQ-6 provides valuable insights into the psychological and behavioral attributes that support peaceful and adaptive interactions.

Calibration

The calibration of the AQ-6 ensures its reliability and validity through a systematic process. Content validation is first conducted to confirm that the items comprehensively represent the concept of individual protective factors. Internal consistency is then tested using measures such as Cronbach’s Alpha to determine the coherence among items. Test-retest reliability is evaluated by administering the index at different time intervals to ensure stability over time. Finally, comparative analysis with other established indices allows for the assessment of concurrent validity and the overall robustness of the AQ-6 as a measurement instrument.

Data Use

The analysis and use of data derived from the AQ-6 index involve multiple statistical and methodological approaches. Factor analysis is applied to identify the underlying dimensions or factors that structure the index. Regression analysis is used to explore the relationships between individual protective factors and other relevant variables, such as the frequency and intensity of conflicts experienced by participants. Cross-validation techniques are also employed to test the generalizability of results across different samples, ensuring that the AQ-6 maintains reliability and predictive power in diverse contexts.

Specific Literature

The theoretical and empirical foundation for the AQ-6 draws from key works in resilience and protective factor research. Werner and Smith (1992) in Overcoming the Odds: High-Risk Children from Birth to Adulthood provide a foundational understanding of protective factors that enable individuals to thrive despite adversity. Luthar and Cicchetti (2000) in The Construct of Resilience: A Critical Evaluation and Guidelines for Future Work offer an in-depth examination of resilience as a psychological construct, emphasizing its measurement and theoretical boundaries. Ungar (2008) in Resilience Across Cultures expands on the cultural dimensions of resilience, illustrating how individual protective factors operate within varied social and cultural frameworks. Collectively, this literature underpins the conceptualization, development, and practical application of the AQ-6 index as a comprehensive tool for assessing individual protective factors in conflict resolution.