Scale Analysis

The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) is a valid and reliable psychometric assessment tool designed to measure perceived social support from three main sources: family, friends, and significant others (e.g., partner, spouse). The scale consists of 12 statements, each rated on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = Very Strongly Disagree, 7 = Very Strongly Agree). The statements are evenly distributed across the three subscales, with 4 items for each. Responses are summed to yield a total social support score as well as subscale scores for support from family, friends, and significant others. The MSPSS is widely used in both research and clinical practice due to its simplicity and its ability to provide a comprehensive and detailed picture of an individual’s perceived social support.

Purpose of the Scale

The aim of the MSPSS is to assess the subjective sense of social support an individual receives from different sources. Specifically, the scale seeks to capture the extent to which individuals feel supported by their family, friends, and significant others in their lives. The use of the MSPSS enables researchers and clinicians to better understand the role of social support in mental health and overall well-being. It provides valuable data for the development of interventions aimed at improving social networking and support, which is critical for addressing psychological problems and enhancing overall quality of life.

Scale Scoring

The MSPSS-12 consists of 12 items rated as follows:
1 = Very strongly disagree
2 = Strongly disagree
3 = Mildly disagree
4 = Neutral
5 = Mildly agree
6 = Strongly agree
7 = Very strongly agree

References

Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.
Edwards, L. M. (2004). Measuring perceived social support in Mexican American youth: Psychometric properties of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26(2), 187–194.